🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.