🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.